Szeto v Situ [2017] NSWSC 1554

Szeto v Situ [2017] NSWSC 1554

The Court preferred the Sister's evidence where it conflicted with the Brother's evidence, found that the Sister provided the settlement shortfall and that the purchase price was paid in almost equal proportions by the parties, with the Brother also paying stamp duty. The Brother's asserted oral agreement and the subsequent conduct did not rebut the presumption arising from those contributions. Accordingly, the Brother held the Carlton Property on trust for himself and the Sister as tenants-in-common in the proportions in which they contributed to the adjusted purchase price, subject to further accounts before distribution of sale proceeds.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
20 November 2017
Procedural Posture
Equity Proceedings Seeking Declaratory Relief Concerning Beneficial Ownership of Real Property and Proceeds of Sale / Principal Judgment After Re Trial Ordered by the Court of Appeal; Cross Claim Issues to Be Heard Separately
Outcome
The Court concluded that the Brother held the Carlton Property on trust for himself and the Sister in the proportions in which they contributed to the adjusted purchase price, and directed the Sister to bring in short minutes of orders; consequential orders concerning sale proceeds were deferred pending accounts and...
Legal Topics
['equitable Estates and Interests' 'beneficial Ownership' 'trusts' 'real Property Ownership' 'accounting Between Co Owners']
['equity' 'real Property'] ['equitable Estates and Interests' 'beneficial Ownership' 'trusts' 'real Property Ownership' 'accounting Between Co Owners']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Equity Proceedings Seeking Declaratory Relief Concerning Beneficial Ownership of Real Property and Proceeds of Sale / Principal Judgment After Re Trial Ordered by the Court of Appeal; Cross Claim Issues to Be Heard Separately

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the Carlton Property, although registered in the Brother's sole name, was held by him beneficially for himself alone or on trust for himself and the Sister." "Whether the parties' contributions to the purchase price rebutted the presumption that the sole registered proprietor was the full beneficial owner." 'Whether any oral agreement or subsequent conduct rebutted the presumption arising from contributions to the purchase price.' 'What conclusions should be reached as to entitlement to the proceeds of sale before the taking of accounts.']

Ratio Decidendi

The Court preferred the Sister's evidence where it conflicted with the Brother's evidence, found that the Sister provided the settlement shortfall and that the purchase price was paid in almost equal proportions by the parties, with the Brother also paying stamp duty. The Brother's asserted oral agreement and the subsequent conduct did not rebut the presumption arising from those contributions. Accordingly, the Brother held the Carlton Property on trust for himself and the Sister as tenants-in-common in the proportions in which they contributed to the adjusted purchase price, subject to further accounts before distribution of sale proceeds.

Court Disposition

The Court concluded that the Brother held the Carlton Property on trust for himself and the Sister in the proportions in which they contributed to the adjusted purchase price, and directed the Sister to bring in short minutes of orders; consequential orders concerning sale proceeds were deferred pending accounts and...

Orders

  • ['Direct the plaintiff to bring in short minutes of orders to give effect to the conclusions reached in the reasons of 20 November 2017 and for the further conduct of the proceedings, including the cross-claim.']