Awad v Awad [2019] NSWSC 385
Michael Awad failed to establish on the balance of probabilities that a clear and binding promise was made and adopted by both Tony and Nouhad Awad such as to induce a personal equity enforceable against Nouhad; his account was not corroborated by reliable evidence, and the required level of proof for proprietary estoppel or constructive trust was not met. His primary claim was therefore refused.
- Parties
- Cross Claimant: Michael Awad; First Cross Defendant: Nouhad Awad by her tutor Zouha Habib; Second Cross Defendant: Arze Awad
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 April 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Cross Claim / Judgment After Final Hearing of Primary Claim, Directions for Written Submissions on Alternative Relief
- Outcome
- Primary relief refused; directions made for submissions as to alternative relief; primary costs awarded to first cross-defendant; alternative relief reserved.
- Legal Topics
- Equitable Estoppel, Proprietary Estoppel, Constructive Trust, Promise to Transfer Property, Credibility of Witnesses, Remedies in Equity, Alternative Relief
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Awad
Cross Claimant
Nouhad Awad by her tutor Zouha Habib
First Cross Defendant
Arze Awad
Second Cross Defendant
Procedural Posture
Cross Claim / Judgment After Final Hearing of Primary Claim, Directions for Written Submissions on Alternative Relief
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a promise was made by Tony and Nouhad Awad to grant Michael Awad a beneficial interest in the property if he paid legal costs and renovation costs
- 2 Whether Michael Awad relied upon that promise to his detriment
- 3 Whether an equity enforceable against Nouhad Awad was established
Ratio Decidendi
Michael Awad failed to establish on the balance of probabilities that a clear and binding promise was made and adopted by both Tony and Nouhad Awad such as to induce a personal equity enforceable against Nouhad; his account was not corroborated by reliable evidence, and the required level of proof for proprietary estoppel or constructive trust was not met. His primary claim was therefore refused.
Court Disposition
Primary relief refused; directions made for submissions as to alternative relief; primary costs awarded to first cross-defendant; alternative relief reserved.
Orders
- The first cross-defendant must bring in short minutes of order reflecting the judgment within seven days of publication.
- The cross-claimant must file and serve any written submissions in relation to the alternative relief in prayers 3 and 4 within 14 days of publication; any application to adduce evidence or for an oral hearing must accompany such submissions with supporting material.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment