In the matter of MINMXT Holdings Pty Limited [2017] NSWSC 1678
Subject to stamping of its loan agreement, Prospa has a security interest entitled to priority over the liquidator and beneficiaries to the extent of $587,035.06; Osborne has a security interest entitled to priority over the liquidator and beneficiaries to the extent of $360,183.06. The funds in court may be distributed accordingly, subject to evidence of stamping and determination regarding accrued interest. There are no other higher priority claimants established.
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Adam Bernard Preiner; Second Plaintiff: MINMXT Holdings Pty Ltd; First Defendant: Nichole Paula Schlebusch; Second Defendant: Morney Schlebusch; Third Defendant: Winghouse Australia Pty Ltd; Fourth Defendant: Peter Bernard Shade and Emily Long; Third Respondent: Prospa Advance Pty Ltd; Fourth Respondent: Hoot Townsville Pty Ltd (in liquidation); Fifth Respondent: Hoot Gold Coast Pty Ltd (in liquidation); Sixth Respondent: Andrew Kent Osborne; Seventh Respondent: Prime Capital Securities Pty Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 December 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Equity—corporations List—application for Determination of Priority and Distribution of Funds / Judgment on Competing Claims to Sale Proceeds and Directions for Further Orders
- Outcome
- Orders deferred pending evidence of stamping and proposals on accrued interest; court satisfied as to priority entitlements of Prospa and Osborne.
- Legal Topics
- Equitable Interests in Trust Property, Priorities Among Creditors, Trustee Indemnity, Unstamped Loan Agreements, Security Interests and Caveats, Liquidator’s Entitlements, Constructive Trust, Equitable Charge, Subrogation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Adam Bernard Preiner
First Plaintiff
MINMXT Holdings Pty Ltd
Second Plaintiff
Nichole Paula Schlebusch
First Defendant
Morney Schlebusch
Second Defendant
Winghouse Australia Pty Ltd
Third Defendant
Peter Bernard Shade and Emily Long
Fourth Defendant
Prospa Advance Pty Ltd
Third Respondent
Hoot Townsville Pty Ltd (in liquidation)
Fourth Respondent
Hoot Gold Coast Pty Ltd (in liquidation)
Fifth Respondent
Andrew Kent Osborne
Sixth Respondent
Prime Capital Securities Pty Limited
Seventh Respondent
Procedural Posture
Equity—corporations List—application for Determination of Priority and Distribution of Funds / Judgment on Competing Claims to Sale Proceeds and Directions for Further Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Prospa and Osborne have priority security interests in trust property proceeds over liquidator and beneficiaries
- 2 Whether unstamped loan agreements affect enforceability and priority of security interests
- 3 Ranking of secured and unsecured claims to trust property proceeds
Ratio Decidendi
Subject to stamping of its loan agreement, Prospa has a security interest entitled to priority over the liquidator and beneficiaries to the extent of $587,035.06; Osborne has a security interest entitled to priority over the liquidator and beneficiaries to the extent of $360,183.06. The funds in court may be distributed accordingly, subject to evidence of stamping and determination regarding accrued interest. There are no other higher priority claimants established.
Court Disposition
Orders deferred pending evidence of stamping and proposals on accrued interest; court satisfied as to priority entitlements of Prospa and Osborne.
Orders
- Subject to stamping, Prospa to have priority security interest of $587,035.06 over liquidator and beneficiaries;
- Osborne to have priority security interest of $360,183.06 over liquidator and beneficiaries;
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment