Hannigan v Inghams Enterprises Pty Ltd [2021] NSWSC 641
It was not unreasonable for Mr Hannigan not to seek damages in the earlier proceedings as damages could not be assessed until it was determined that the contract remained on foot, and special circumstances exist justifying permitting the damages claim to proceed despite any arguable unreasonableness.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 June 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Stay Proceedings / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Permanent Stay
- Outcome
- Application to stay proceedings dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['estoppel' 'anshun Estoppel' 'estoppel by Judgment' 'procedural Rulings' 'unreasonableness of Conduct' 'declaratory Relief' 'damages Claim' 'stay of Proceedings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application to Stay Proceedings / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Permanent Stay
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether plaintiff's damages claim should be stayed by reason of Anshun estoppel" 'Whether it was unreasonable for plaintiff not to have brought damages claim in earlier proceedings' 'Whether special circumstances exist to permit the claim']
Ratio Decidendi
It was not unreasonable for Mr Hannigan not to seek damages in the earlier proceedings as damages could not be assessed until it was determined that the contract remained on foot, and special circumstances exist justifying permitting the damages claim to proceed despite any arguable unreasonableness.
Court Disposition
Application to stay proceedings dismissed
Orders
- ['Notice of motion dated 20 February 2021 dismissed with costs' 'Matter listed for directions on 11 June 2021 before Commercial List Judge']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment