R v Biljuh (No 4) [2015] NSWSC 774

R v Biljuh (No 4) [2015] NSWSC 774

The question was rejected because it sought to introduce through cross-examination of the accused relevant and admissible evidence that could have and should have been led during the Crown case, following the reasoning in The Queen v Soma.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
15 June 2015
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Trial Ruling
Outcome
Objection upheld; question rejected.
Legal Topics
['evidence' 'cross Examination' 'objection to Question']
['criminal Law'] ['evidence' 'cross Examination' 'objection to Question']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Trial Ruling

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether a question to the accused in cross-examination about evidence not led in the Crown case is admissible.']

Ratio Decidendi

The question was rejected because it sought to introduce through cross-examination of the accused relevant and admissible evidence that could have and should have been led during the Crown case, following the reasoning in The Queen v Soma.

Court Disposition

Objection upheld; question rejected.

Orders

  • ['Objection upheld to question asked by Crown Prosecutor.' 'Question rejected.']