R v Early (No 5) [2023] NSWSC 580

It is in the administration of justice to direct evidence by audio-visual link for Barry Sutton, considering his medical incapacity, risks related to travel, and the interests of justice.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 18 May 2023
Procedural Posture: Criminal / Procedural Ruling on Witness Evidence (murder Trial)
Outcome: Application granted for direction under s 5B: Witness Barry Sutton to give evidence by audio-visual link.
Legal Topics: ['evidence' 'audio Visual Link' 'witness Availability']

['criminal Law'] ['evidence' 'audio Visual Link' 'witness Availability']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Procedural Ruling on Witness Evidence (murder Trial)

Legal Issues

1 ['Whether a direction should be granted for witness Barry Sutton to give evidence via audio-visual link due to medical incapacity']

Ratio Decidendi

It is in the administration of justice to direct evidence by audio-visual link for Barry Sutton, considering his medical incapacity, risks related to travel, and the interests of justice.

Court Disposition

Application granted for direction under s 5B: Witness Barry Sutton to give evidence by audio-visual link.

Orders

['Barry Sutton to give evidence by audio-visual link from a place other than the courtroom, namely Bundaberg Court.']