R v Alkanaan [2015] NSWSC 911
The ERISP was admissible because the detention warrant complied with the prescribed statutory form and did not require inclusion of jurisdictional facts on its face. Further, no factual basis was established to support claims that the admissions were procured by threats or improper conduct; the accused was properly cautioned and the interview was voluntary.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 July 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Voir Dire; Ruling on Admissibility of Evidence Prior to Trial
- Outcome
- Application to exclude the ERISP dismissed; ERISP admitted as evidence.
- Legal Topics
- ['evidence' 'admissibility of Admissions' 'detention Warrants' 'police Questioning' 'voluntariness of Confessions']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Voir Dire; Ruling on Admissibility of Evidence Prior to Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the extension of detention warrant for the accused was valid' 'Whether admissions made in the ERISP were influenced by threats or improper police conduct and should be excluded']
Ratio Decidendi
The ERISP was admissible because the detention warrant complied with the prescribed statutory form and did not require inclusion of jurisdictional facts on its face. Further, no factual basis was established to support claims that the admissions were procured by threats or improper conduct; the accused was properly cautioned and the interview was voluntary.
Court Disposition
Application to exclude the ERISP dismissed; ERISP admitted as evidence.
Orders
- ['The ERISP is admissible in the trial of Mr Alkanaan and is not excluded.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment