R v Yana ORM [2011] NSWDC 26
The accused failed to establish on the balance of probabilities that the police search was illegal or improper, as the evidence shows he interpreted the officer’s statement as a request rather than a direction, and his consent was willingly given. Any impropriety was neither intentional nor reckless. Even if impropriety had been established, the desirability of admitting the evidence outweighed the undesirability under s 138 of the Evidence Act. Therefore, the evidence is admitted.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 February 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Voir Dire Ruling on Evidentiary Admissibility Prior to Trial
- Outcome
- Evidence admitted
- Legal Topics
- ['exclusion of Evidence' 'illegally Obtained Evidence' 'police Powers' 'consent to Search' 'admissibility of Admissions']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Voir Dire Ruling on Evidentiary Admissibility Prior to Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether police search of accused's vehicle was illegal or improper" "Whether accused's consent to search was genuinely given or overborne by police conduct" 'Whether evidence obtained in the search ought to be excluded under s 138 of the Evidence Act 1995']
Ratio Decidendi
The accused failed to establish on the balance of probabilities that the police search was illegal or improper, as the evidence shows he interpreted the officer’s statement as a request rather than a direction, and his consent was willingly given. Any impropriety was neither intentional nor reckless. Even if impropriety had been established, the desirability of admitting the evidence outweighed the undesirability under s 138 of the Evidence Act. Therefore, the evidence is admitted.
Court Disposition
Evidence admitted
Orders
- ['Evidence of the search and admissions made by the accused are admitted for trial.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment