Awad v Bucasia Pty Ltd [2003] NSWADT 247

Awad v Bucasia Pty Ltd [2003] NSWADT 247

The applicant failed to prove that notice of exercise of the option to renew was received by the respondent or its agent before the contractual deadline, and no estoppel or unconscionable conduct by the respondent was established.

Parties
Applicant Lessee: Regaie Gaber Ekladious Awad trading as Eastwood Night & Day Pharmacy; Respondent Lessor: Bucasia Pty Ltd
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
18 November 2003
Procedural Posture
Claim for Declaration of Rights, Obligations and Liabilities Under a Lease / Final Decision
Outcome
Application by applicant lessee dismissed
Legal Topics
Exercise of Option to Renew Lease, Estoppel, Unconscionable Conduct

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regaie Gaber Ekladious Awad trading as Eastwood Night & Day Pharmacy

Applicant Lessee

Bucasia Pty Ltd

Respondent Lessor

Procedural Posture

Claim for Declaration of Rights, Obligations and Liabilities Under a Lease / Final Decision

  1. 1 Whether the applicant validly exercised the option to renew the lease under clause 20.1
  2. 2 Whether estoppel or unconscionable conduct prevents the respondent from denying renewal

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to prove that notice of exercise of the option to renew was received by the respondent or its agent before the contractual deadline, and no estoppel or unconscionable conduct by the respondent was established.

Court Disposition

Application by applicant lessee dismissed

Orders

  • Application by Applicant Lessee dismissed
  • Each party to file written submissions on costs (including costs of Lessee's application for urgent interim order) within 28 days, in absence of agreement