Masig People v State of Queensland [2000] FCA 1067
The Court was satisfied that historical and other material established the Masig people as a separate and distinct people with descent from the people of Masig and Damuth at annexation, continuing identification with their traditional lands, ongoing customary exchange relations, adherence to traditional principles, laws and customs concerning land tenure, and no dispossession by British or Australian governments. Together with the parties' agreement recognising other interests, this made it proper to determine that native title exists and is held by the Masigalgal, with the rights, limitations and trust arrangement stated in the orders.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 July 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Native Title Determination Applications / Consent Determination
- Outcome
- Native title determined by consent to exist in the determination area, with the Masigalgal identified as the common law holders and the native title to be held in trust by the Masigalgal (Torres Strait Islanders) Corporation.
- Legal Topics
- ['existence of Native Title' 'communal and Group Native Title Rights' 'traditional Laws and Customs' 'other Interests in Determination Area' 'native Title Held in Trust']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Native Title Determination Applications / Consent Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether, notwithstanding the consent of all parties, the Court should be satisfied under the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) that it is proper to make the proposed determination of native title.' 'Whether native title exists in relation to Masig Island, Damuth Island and the surrounding islands, and who holds the communal and group rights comprising that native title.' 'What native title rights and interests exist, how they relate to other interests in the determination area, and whether the native title should be held in trust.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court was satisfied that historical and other material established the Masig people as a separate and distinct people with descent from the people of Masig and Damuth at annexation, continuing identification with their traditional lands, ongoing customary exchange relations, adherence to traditional principles, laws and customs concerning land tenure, and no dispossession by British or Australian governments. Together with the parties' agreement recognising other interests, this made it proper to determine that native title exists and is held by the Masigalgal, with the rights, limitations and trust arrangement stated in the orders.
Court Disposition
Native title determined by consent to exist in the determination area, with the Masigalgal identified as the common law holders and the native title to be held in trust by the Masigalgal (Torres Strait Islanders) Corporation.
Orders
- ['Native title exists in relation to the determination area comprising the land and inland waters of Masig (Yorke) Island, Kadal (Kodall) Islet, Umaga (Keats) Island, Igaba (Marsden) Island, Kabbikane Islet, Mimay (Mimi) Islet, Aukane Islet, Yau (Layoak) Islet, Mauar (Rennel) Island, Roag (Smith) Cay, Damuth...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment