R v Warwick (No.49) [2018] NSWSC 1557
The underlying documents relied upon by the expert, Dr Bruce, are admitted as evidence subject to a limitation under s 136 of the Evidence Act 1995 such that the documents are admitted to prove the material relied upon for expressing expert opinion, but not as to the truth of the contents of the DNA Submission Sheet, pending further evidence.
- Parties
- Prosecution: The Crown; Accused: Leonard John Warwick
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 September 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Procedural Ruling on Admissibility of Evidence During Trial
- Outcome
- Documents admitted with limitation on use
- Legal Topics
- Expert Evidence, Documentary Evidence, Admissibility of Evidence, Limitation on Use of Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Crown
Prosecution
Leonard John Warwick
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Procedural Ruling on Admissibility of Evidence During Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether expert reports and underlying documents related to DNA analysis are admissible as evidence
- 2 Whether limitation should be imposed on the use of DNA Submission Sheet pending further evidence
Ratio Decidendi
The underlying documents relied upon by the expert, Dr Bruce, are admitted as evidence subject to a limitation under s 136 of the Evidence Act 1995 such that the documents are admitted to prove the material relied upon for expressing expert opinion, but not as to the truth of the contents of the DNA Submission Sheet, pending further evidence.
Court Disposition
Documents admitted with limitation on use
Orders
- The documents which were formerly marked MFI SSSS will be admitted and marked Exh 171.
- The document entitled 'DNA Submission Sheet' will, pursuant to s 136 of the Evidence Act 1995 be subject to a limitation on use, namely that the contents of the document are not admitted as being true.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment