Chaina v Presbyterian Church (NSW) Property Trust (No. 17) [2013] NSWSC 1580
The report was not rejected at this stage because the author demonstrated sufficient expertise, the report considered the relevant period from 1999 to 2016 and was not solely concerned with later matters, and any present lack of evidentiary support for assumptions was a matter that could ultimately affect weight after the evidence and submissions were complete.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 November 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Applications / Objection to Expert Evidence Admissibility During Hearing
- Outcome
- Report of Ben Wheaton of January 2012 not rejected at this stage of the hearing.
- Legal Topics
- ['expert Evidence' 'admissibility' 'expertise of Expert Witness' 'assumptions in Expert Report' 'relevant Time Period']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Applications / Objection to Expert Evidence Admissibility During Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the author of the January 2012 report of Ben Wheaton had the necessary expertise to give the opinions in the report.' 'Whether the report was inadmissible because it did not relate to the relevant time period.' 'Whether assumptions made in the report were unsupported by the evidence.' 'Whether material concerning the domestic market should be admitted.']
Ratio Decidendi
The report was not rejected at this stage because the author demonstrated sufficient expertise, the report considered the relevant period from 1999 to 2016 and was not solely concerned with later matters, and any present lack of evidentiary support for assumptions was a matter that could ultimately affect weight after the evidence and submissions were complete.
Court Disposition
Report of Ben Wheaton of January 2012 not rejected at this stage of the hearing.
Orders
- ['The report will not at this stage be rejected.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment