Coal Management Operations & Processing Pty Limited v Resource Pacific Limited [2009] NSWSC 796

Coal Management Operations & Processing Pty Limited v Resource Pacific Limited [2009] NSWSC 796

Although the questions directed to Mr Galt did not precisely reflect the Court-settled questions, his report sufficiently identified practices of reasonably prudent directors of coal mining companies to show that such evidence may assist in resolving issues likely to arise, so the expert evidence process should not be terminated at this stage; the other parties should be permitted to obtain and serve relevant reports, and because the matter was being adjourned in any event, extending time for the defendant's lay evidence would not occasion prejudice.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
31 July 2009
Procedural Posture
Procedural and Other Rulings; Evidence; Expert Evidence; Single Experts / Further Directions Concerning Expert Evidence and Extension of Time for Service of the Defendant's Lay Evidence
Outcome
Proceedings adjourned for further directions; time extended for service of the defendant's lay evidence.
Legal Topics
['expert Evidence' 'single Experts' 'directions' 'service of Evidence' 'coal Mining Industry Due Diligence Evidence']
['evidence' 'civil Procedure'] ['expert Evidence' 'single Experts' 'directions' 'service of Evidence' 'coal Mining Industry Due Diligence Evidence']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Procedural and Other Rulings; Evidence; Expert Evidence; Single Experts / Further Directions Concerning Expert Evidence and Extension of Time for Service of the Defendant's Lay Evidence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the expert report of Gordon Galt, despite being based on questions that did not precisely reflect the questions settled by the Court, sufficiently identified relevant practices to justify continuing the expert evidence process.' 'Whether the other parties should be permitted to obtain and serve relevant expert reports.' "Whether time should be extended for service of the defendant's lay evidence."]

Ratio Decidendi

Although the questions directed to Mr Galt did not precisely reflect the Court-settled questions, his report sufficiently identified practices of reasonably prudent directors of coal mining companies to show that such evidence may assist in resolving issues likely to arise, so the expert evidence process should not be terminated at this stage; the other parties should be permitted to obtain and serve relevant reports, and because the matter was being adjourned in any event, extending time for the defendant's lay evidence would not occasion prejudice.

Court Disposition

Proceedings adjourned for further directions; time extended for service of the defendant's lay evidence.

Orders

  • ['Adjourn the proceedings generally for further directions on 1 September 2009 at 9.30 am before Brereton J.' "Extend time for service of the defendant's lay evidence to 14 August 2009."]