Gothard, in the matter of Sherwin Iron Limited (Administrators Appointed) (Receivers and Managers Appointed) [2014] FCA 826
The convening period was extended because the administrators lacked sufficient information to make an informed recommendation to creditors, the receivers and managers needed substantial time to pursue environmental and mining approvals and investigate recapitalisation, those steps had a real prospect of increasing recoveries by turning undeveloped mining tenements into an approved mining operation, creditors supported the principle of an extension, no significant prejudice was identified, and a shorter extension would not meet the practical timetable required.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 August 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Corporations Application for Extension of Convening Period Under S 439 A(6) of the Corporations Act 2001 (cth) / First Instance Application; Orders Made on 5 August 2014
- Outcome
- Application granted; orders substantially as sought made.
- Legal Topics
- ['extension of Convening Period' 'meeting of Creditors' 'part 5.3 a Administration' 'receivers and Managers' 'deed of Company Arrangement' 'mining Project Approvals']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Corporations Application for Extension of Convening Period Under S 439 A(6) of the Corporations Act 2001 (cth) / First Instance Application; Orders Made on 5 August 2014
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the period specified by s 439A of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) for convening meetings of creditors of the companies should be extended to midnight on 14 April 2015.' 'Whether Part 5.3A of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) should take effect so that the meetings of creditors required by s 439A(1) may be held at any time on or before 14 April 2015 or within 5 business days after that date.']
Ratio Decidendi
The convening period was extended because the administrators lacked sufficient information to make an informed recommendation to creditors, the receivers and managers needed substantial time to pursue environmental and mining approvals and investigate recapitalisation, those steps had a real prospect of increasing recoveries by turning undeveloped mining tenements into an approved mining operation, creditors supported the principle of an extension, no significant prejudice was identified, and a shorter extension would not meet the practical timetable required.
Court Disposition
Application granted; orders substantially as sought made.
Orders
- ['The application be made returnable instanter.' 'The plaintiffs have leave to file in Court the affidavit of John Melluish sworn 4 August 2014.' 'Pursuant to s 439A(6) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), the period specified by s 439A of the Act for the convening of a meeting of creditors of each of the companies...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment