SZUTZ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 186
The application for extension of time and leave to appeal was dismissed because (1) the applicants failed to identify any legal or factual error in the Tribunal's or the Federal Circuit Court's decisions, (2) the substantive application was wholly without merit, and (3) while the delay was acceptably explained and caused no prejudice to the respondent, the absence of merit in the grounds of appeal precluded granting the application.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 March 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for extension of time and leave to appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['extension of Time' 'leave to Appeal' 'judicial Review' 'visa Refusal']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the applicants should be granted an extension of time and leave to appeal against the Federal Circuit Court's interlocutory judgment refusing judicial review of a Refugee Review Tribunal decision."]
Ratio Decidendi
The application for extension of time and leave to appeal was dismissed because (1) the applicants failed to identify any legal or factual error in the Tribunal's or the Federal Circuit Court's decisions, (2) the substantive application was wholly without merit, and (3) while the delay was acceptably explained and caused no prejudice to the respondent, the absence of merit in the grounds of appeal precluded granting the application.
Court Disposition
Application for extension of time and leave to appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['The application for an extension of time and leave to appeal filed on 8 December 2014 be dismissed.' "The applicants pay the first respondent's costs."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment