Adam Troy v Aldo Salucci [2002] NSWCA 43
Leave to appeal was refused because the District Court judge assessed the relevant evidence, the finding was open on the evidence, the discretionary assessment did not appear to have miscarried, and no issue of legal principle arose under s 79A of the Motor Accidents Act 1988 (NSW).
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 February 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Motor Accident; Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal From District Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Summons for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['extension of Time' 'leave to Appeal' 'quantum of Damages' 'non Economic Loss' 'section 79 a Motor Accidents Act 1988 (nsw)']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Motor Accident; Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal From District Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether time should be extended for filing an ordinary summons for leave to appeal.' 'Whether leave to appeal should be granted from the District Court assessment of non-economic loss of $93,500.' 'Whether the assessment of non-economic loss was excessive, outside the range for the injuries, or outside s 79A of the Motor Accidents Act 1988 (NSW).']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal was refused because the District Court judge assessed the relevant evidence, the finding was open on the evidence, the discretionary assessment did not appear to have miscarried, and no issue of legal principle arose under s 79A of the Motor Accidents Act 1988 (NSW).
Court Disposition
Summons for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['The summons for leave to appeal is refused.' 'The summons for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment