SZKOX v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 990
Applicant's proposed grounds of appeal lacked merit because the Tribunal's use of previous findings was permissible under s 416 and independent judgment was exercised; no jurisdictional error on credibility findings or reliance issues.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 September 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Migration Extension of Time Application / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time to Seek Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['extension of Time' 'credibility Findings' 'reliance on Findings of Previous Tribunal' 'complementary Protection']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Migration Extension of Time Application / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time to Seek Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether proposed grounds of appeal have merit' 'Whether Tribunal placed undue reliance on the decision of previous Tribunal' "Whether Tribunal's adverse credibility findings constituted jurisdictional error"]
Ratio Decidendi
Applicant's proposed grounds of appeal lacked merit because the Tribunal's use of previous findings was permissible under s 416 and independent judgment was exercised; no jurisdictional error on credibility findings or reliance issues.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- ["The name of the second respondent, 'Refugee Review Tribunal', be amended to 'Administrative Appeals Tribunal'." "The first applicant's application for an extension of time to seek leave to appeal is dismissed." "Applicants to pay respondents' costs of and incidental to the application."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment