Kumari v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 543

Kumari v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 543

The application for extension of time and leave to appeal was dismissed because the applicants failed to identify any substantive ground of appeal and had not shown sufficient doubt in the previous decision or prospect of success, thus making the application without merit.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
21 May 2014
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['extension of Time' 'leave to Appeal' 'judicial Review' 'visa Refusal']
['migration Law'] ['extension of Time' 'leave to Appeal' 'judicial Review' 'visa Refusal']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether an extension of time should be granted to seek leave to appeal' 'Whether leave to appeal should be granted from an interlocutory decision dismissing a judicial review application' 'Whether applicants identified any arguable ground for appeal or judicial review']

Ratio Decidendi

The application for extension of time and leave to appeal was dismissed because the applicants failed to identify any substantive ground of appeal and had not shown sufficient doubt in the previous decision or prospect of success, thus making the application without merit.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ['The application be dismissed.' 'The applicant pay the costs of the first respondent.']