Concourt Pty Ltd v Victoria Mary Kerr [2015] NSWCATAP 106
There was insufficient explanation for delay in builder's appeal, merits of builder's grounds were weak, and Tribunal's reasoning met legal adequacy standards; owner's appeal partially succeeded as Tribunal erred in not applying agreed rectification cost for tiles, warranting variation of award.
- Parties
- Appellant in AP 15/10590; Respondent in AP 15/59781: Concourt Pty Ltd; Appellant in AP 15/59781; Respondent in AP 15/10590: Victoria Mary Kerr
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 June 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal Panel Decision
- Outcome
- Builder's appeal out of time dismissed; owner's appeal allowed in part; directions to parties to bring in orders reflecting findings and submissions on costs.
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Error of Fact or Law, Practical Completion, Retention Monies, Rectification Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Concourt Pty Ltd
Appellant in AP 15/10590; Respondent in AP 15/59781
Victoria Mary Kerr
Appellant in AP 15/59781; Respondent in AP 15/10590
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Panel Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal erred on practical completion findings
- 2 Whether retention monies and interest were incorrectly calculated
- 3 Whether Tribunal erred in rectification of tiles
Ratio Decidendi
There was insufficient explanation for delay in builder's appeal, merits of builder's grounds were weak, and Tribunal's reasoning met legal adequacy standards; owner's appeal partially succeeded as Tribunal erred in not applying agreed rectification cost for tiles, warranting variation of award.
Court Disposition
Builder's appeal out of time dismissed; owner's appeal allowed in part; directions to parties to bring in orders reflecting findings and submissions on costs.
Orders
- The application for leave to appeal out of time is dismissed.
- The appeal is otherwise dismissed (AP 14/59781).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment