Singh v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 1335

Singh v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 1335

Due to the applicant's failure to appear after being given notice, the application is dismissed with costs under the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) and Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth).

Parties
First Applicant: Harinder Singh; Second Applicant: Rajinder Kaur; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration and Border Protection; Second Respondent: Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
10 November 2017
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal / Decision on Application
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal, Dismissal for Want of Appearance

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Harinder Singh

First Applicant

Rajinder Kaur

Second Applicant

Minister for Immigration and Border Protection

First Respondent

Administrative Appeals Tribunal

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal / Decision on Application

  1. 1 Whether the application for extension of time and leave to appeal should be granted when the applicant has failed to appear.

Ratio Decidendi

Due to the applicant's failure to appear after being given notice, the application is dismissed with costs under the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) and Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth).

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The application be dismissed with costs.