Wyllie & Ors. v. Tarrison Pty. Limited & Ors. [2007] NSWCA 95
The proposed cross-appeal has insufficient prospects of success, considering the weight of evidence and relevant agreements, to justify granting an extension of time.
- Parties
- 1st Appellant: William Anthony Wyllie; 2nd Appellant: Vengreen Pty. Limited; 3rd Appellant: Sydney Harbour Seaplanes Pty. Limited; 1st Respondent: Tarrison Pty. Limited; 2nd Respondent: Ross Edward Seller; 3rd Respondent: Rensen Pty. Limited; Proposed Cross Respondent: Mr. Peter Kane
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 April 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Court of Appeal Proceeding / Application for Extension of Time to Bring Cross Appeal
- Outcome
- Notice of motion dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Cross Appeal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
William Anthony Wyllie
1st Appellant
Vengreen Pty. Limited
2nd Appellant
Sydney Harbour Seaplanes Pty. Limited
3rd Appellant
Tarrison Pty. Limited
1st Respondent
Ross Edward Seller
2nd Respondent
Rensen Pty. Limited
3rd Respondent
Mr. Peter Kane
Proposed Cross Respondent
Procedural Posture
Court of Appeal Proceeding / Application for Extension of Time to Bring Cross Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to grant an extension of time to file a cross-appeal against Mr Kane
Ratio Decidendi
The proposed cross-appeal has insufficient prospects of success, considering the weight of evidence and relevant agreements, to justify granting an extension of time.
Court Disposition
Notice of motion dismissed
Orders
- Notice of Motion dismissed.
- Order that Tarrison Pty. Limited pay the costs of the appellants and Mr. Kane of the Notice of Motion.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment