White v Attwells; Attwells v White [2019] NSWSC 1278
The Court held that although the statement of claim became stale for lack of timely service, the delay was sufficiently explained by mistaken understanding and difficulty in obtaining information. The procedural irregularity in not serving the notice of motion did not nullify the earlier extension order, but that extension should be varied to avoid prejudice regarding limitation periods. Extensions of time for service were granted and leave to amend pleadings allowed, as the conduct of the plaintiff in both proceedings was not such as to warrant striking out or dismissal.
- Parties
- Plaintiff (2017/239938), First Defendant (2017/382284): Gary Alan White; Defendant (2017/239938), Plaintiff (2017/382284): Noel Bruce Attwells; Second Defendant (2017/382284): John Kelly SC
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 September 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Applications in Civil Proceedings (fees and Negligence) / Post Transfer to Supreme Court, Determination of Interlocutory Motions and Applications to Amend Pleadings
- Outcome
- Motions for extension of time, validation of service, and amendment of pleadings granted in substantial part; applications to dismiss, strike out, or set aside process or service dismissed; costs orders made as per event, thrown away costs for amendments ordered against plaintiff where appropriate.
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time for Service, Procedural Irregularity, Validation of Stale Originating Process, Amendment of Pleadings, Costs in Interlocutory Applications
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gary Alan White
Plaintiff (2017/239938), First Defendant (2017/382284)
Noel Bruce Attwells
Defendant (2017/239938), Plaintiff (2017/382284)
John Kelly SC
Second Defendant (2017/382284)
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Applications in Civil Proceedings (fees and Negligence) / Post Transfer to Supreme Court, Determination of Interlocutory Motions and Applications to Amend Pleadings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the service of a stale statement of claim can be validated or extended via court order
- 2 Whether the failure to serve a motion on an affected party is a procedural irregularity under s 63 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW)
- 3 Whether time for service of the statement of claim should be extended against defendants
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that although the statement of claim became stale for lack of timely service, the delay was sufficiently explained by mistaken understanding and difficulty in obtaining information. The procedural irregularity in not serving the notice of motion did not nullify the earlier extension order, but that extension should be varied to avoid prejudice regarding limitation periods. Extensions of time for service were granted and leave to amend pleadings allowed, as the conduct of the plaintiff in both proceedings was not such as to warrant striking out or dismissal.
Court Disposition
Motions for extension of time, validation of service, and amendment of pleadings granted in substantial part; applications to dismiss, strike out, or set aside process or service dismissed; costs orders made as per event, thrown away costs for amendments ordered against plaintiff where appropriate.
Orders
- Leave granted to Attwells to file defence and cross-claim against White in fees proceeding, subject to conditions.
- Defendant's amended notice of motion (7 June 2019) otherwise dismissed in fees proceeding.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment