BALTIC SHIPPING CO v GEOFFREY PHILLIP MERCHANT and ORS [1993] NSWCA 19
Extension of time to file notice of appeal is conditional on payment of $810,000 or provision of a bond. Costs of the day's application will be costs in the appeal.
- Parties
- Opponent: Baltic Shipping Co; Claimants/respondents: Geoffrey Phillip Merchant and Ors
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 August 1993
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Interlocutory Application for Extension of Time and Costs Order
- Outcome
- Extension of time to appeal granted on condition. Costs of application to be costs in the appeal.
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time to Appeal, Conditional Leave to Appeal, Costs of Interlocutory Application
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Baltic Shipping Co
Opponent
Geoffrey Phillip Merchant and Ors
Claimants/respondents
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Interlocutory Application for Extension of Time and Costs Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave to appeal should be rescinded or made conditional on payment
- 2 Whether an extension of time to file notice of appeal should be granted, and on what terms
- 3 What is a reasonable time for payment of verdict moneys
Ratio Decidendi
Extension of time to file notice of appeal is conditional on payment of $810,000 or provision of a bond. Costs of the day's application will be costs in the appeal.
Court Disposition
Extension of time to appeal granted on condition. Costs of application to be costs in the appeal.
Orders
- Extension of time to file notice of appeal until 5 pm today, conditional on payment of $810,000 or provision of an irrevocable bank bond by 5 pm on 19 August 1993.
- If payment or bond not provided by deadline, claimants may move to have appeal struck out on 24 hours notice.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment