Mustaq v Mir Bros Enterprises Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCATAP 86

Mustaq v Mir Bros Enterprises Pty Ltd [2014] NSWCATAP 86

The appellants were not notified of the hearing date through no fault of their own, were deprived of the opportunity to present their case, and appeared to have a prima facie arguable defence to the landlord's claim; this caused a miscarriage of justice, justifying leave to file out of time, leave to appeal on the merits, quashing of the order below, and reconsideration by the Tribunal below.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
18 November 2014
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Tribunal Tenancy Order / On the Papers; Application for Leave to File Notice of Appeal Out of Time and Leave to Appeal on the Merits
Outcome
Appeal upheld; order made by the Tribunal below quashed; case ordered to be reconsidered by the Tribunal below.
Legal Topics
['failure to Notify Hearing Date' 'appellants Overseas' 'miscarriage of Justice' 'out of Time Appeal' 'leave to Appeal on the Merits']
['residential Tenancy' 'civil and Administrative Tribunal Procedure'] ['failure to Notify Hearing Date' 'appellants Overseas' 'miscarriage of Justice' 'out of Time Appeal' 'leave to Appeal on the Merits']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal From Tribunal Tenancy Order / On the Papers; Application for Leave to File Notice of Appeal Out of Time and Leave to Appeal on the Merits

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the appellants should be granted leave to file the notice of appeal out of time up to and including 30 April 2014.' 'Whether leave to appeal on the merits should be granted.' 'Whether failure to notify the appellants of the hearing deprived them of the opportunity to present their case and caused a miscarriage of justice.' 'Whether the order made by the Tribunal below should be quashed and the case reconsidered.']

Ratio Decidendi

The appellants were not notified of the hearing date through no fault of their own, were deprived of the opportunity to present their case, and appeared to have a prima facie arguable defence to the landlord's claim; this caused a miscarriage of justice, justifying leave to file out of time, leave to appeal on the merits, quashing of the order below, and reconsideration by the Tribunal below.

Court Disposition

Appeal upheld; order made by the Tribunal below quashed; case ordered to be reconsidered by the Tribunal below.

Orders

  • ['Leave to file notice of appeal up to and including 30 April 2014.' 'Leave to appeal on the merits granted.' 'Appeal upheld and order made by the Tribunal below quashed.' 'Pursuant to s81 (i) (e) of the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act order that the case be reconsidered by the Tribunal below upon such...