R v Bin LI and Kun WANG [2013] NSWDC 211
Li's offending was extensive, well organised and supported by sophisticated plant and equipment, involved participatory credit card offending, preparatory identity document offending and a distinct drug supply offence, and was aggravated in context by prior dishonesty convictions, but his early guilty plea and special circumstances justified a 25 per cent discount and an adjusted non-parole period. Wang's role was less than Li's but she was an operative facilitator of a systematic scheme over a significant period, receiving, possessing, concealing, disposing of and transacting with proceeds of crime; her early guilty plea, lack of prior convictions and special circumstances justified a 25...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 August 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentence / Remarks on Sentence After Pleas of Guilty
- Outcome
- Bin Li was sentenced to an aggregate sentence of 7 years and 6 months imprisonment with a non-parole period of 4 years and 7 months. Kun Wang was sentenced to 2 years and 3 months imprisonment with a non-parole period of 1 year and 2 months and an order directing her release on parole on 14 October 2014.
- Legal Topics
- ['false Documents' 'identification Documents' 'proceeds of Crime' 'supply of Prohibited Drug' 'aggregate Sentence' 'non Parole Period' 'special Circumstances' 'parole Order' 'forfeiture' 'drug Destruction Order']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence / Remarks on Sentence After Pleas of Guilty
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What sentences should be imposed on Bin Li for offences involving false documents, identification document equipment and supply of methylamphetamine, with a Form 1 proceeds of crime offence taken into account.' 'What sentence should be imposed on Kun Wang for knowingly dealing with proceeds of crime.' 'Whether pleas of guilty warranted a discount.' 'Whether special circumstances warranted adjustment of the statutory ratio between sentence and non-parole period.' 'Whether Ms Wang should be released on parole at the expiry of her non-parole period.']
Ratio Decidendi
Li's offending was extensive, well organised and supported by sophisticated plant and equipment, involved participatory credit card offending, preparatory identity document offending and a distinct drug supply offence, and was aggravated in context by prior dishonesty convictions, but his early guilty plea and special circumstances justified a 25 per cent discount and an adjusted non-parole period. Wang's role was less than Li's but she was an operative facilitator of a systematic scheme over a significant period, receiving, possessing, concealing, disposing of and transacting with proceeds of crime; her early guilty plea, lack of prior convictions and special circumstances justified a 25...
Court Disposition
Bin Li was sentenced to an aggregate sentence of 7 years and 6 months imprisonment with a non-parole period of 4 years and 7 months. Kun Wang was sentenced to 2 years and 3 months imprisonment with a non-parole period of 1 year and 2 months and an order directing her release on parole on 14 October 2014.
Orders
- ['Bin Li: aggregate sentence of 7 years and 6 months imprisonment commencing 18 October 2011 and expiring 17 April 2019.' 'Bin Li: non-parole period of 4 years and 7 months commencing 18 October 2011 and expiring 17 May 2016.' 'Bin Li: Form 1 offence of knowingly dealing with proceeds of crime taken into account for...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment