R v NAIME [2008] NSWDC 193

R v NAIME [2008] NSWDC 193

The accused, acting without authority and for personal benefit, made a false statement to obtain a sole signatory account, conducted unauthorised financial transfers and withdrawals, and engaged in conduct amounting to dishonesty and deception as defined by s.178BB and s.178BA of the Crimes Act 1900. The evidence established beyond reasonable doubt all elements of the offences except count 4, for which reasonable doubt remained.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Trial Judgment (verdict)
Outcome
Guilty on counts 1–3, 5–20; Not guilty on count 4
Legal Topics
['false Pretences' 'fraud' 'imposition' 'obtaining by Deception' 'making a False Statement']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Trial Judgment (verdict)

  1. 1 ['Whether the accused made a false statement with intent to obtain a financial advantage under s.178BB of the Crimes Act 1900' 'Whether the accused dishonestly obtained a financial advantage by deception under s.178BA of the Crimes Act 1900']

Ratio Decidendi

The accused, acting without authority and for personal benefit, made a false statement to obtain a sole signatory account, conducted unauthorised financial transfers and withdrawals, and engaged in conduct amounting to dishonesty and deception as defined by s.178BB and s.178BA of the Crimes Act 1900. The evidence established beyond reasonable doubt all elements of the offences except count 4, for which reasonable doubt remained.

Court Disposition

Guilty on counts 1–3, 5–20; Not guilty on count 4

Orders

  • ['Separate verdicts returned for each charge' 'Accused found guilty of all charges except count 4, for which acquittal entered']