Russell v Quinton [2000] NSWSC 322

Russell v Quinton [2000] NSWSC 322

The application for approval of the release in the Cohabitation Deed was rejected as it was not prudent, fair or reasonable in all the circumstances, and the plaintiff did not give due consideration to independent advice. The plaintiff was found not to have received adequate provision from the estate and was awarded further provision totalling $522,000 in lieu of the provision made for her by will.

Parties
Plaintiff/cross Defendant: Kaye Lorraine Russell; Defendant/cross Claimant: Luke William Quinton
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
17 April 2000
Procedural Posture
Application for Family Provision and Cross Claim for Approval of Release Under Family Provision Act 1982 / Judgment After Hearing
Outcome
Application for approval of the release rejected. Cross claim dismissed. Order for further provision.
Legal Topics
Family Provision Act 1982, Cohabitation Agreements, Release of Rights Under Will, Assessment of Proper Provision From Estate
Equity Succession Law Family Provision Act 1982 Cohabitation Agreements Release of Rights Under Will Assessment of Proper Provision From Estate

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kaye Lorraine Russell

Plaintiff/cross Defendant

Luke William Quinton

Defendant/cross Claimant

Procedural Posture

Application for Family Provision and Cross Claim for Approval of Release Under Family Provision Act 1982 / Judgment After Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the court should approve the release contained in the Cohabitation Deed under s 31 of the Family Provision Act 1982
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff received adequate provision from the deceased's estate under s 7 of the Family Provision Act 1982

Ratio Decidendi

The application for approval of the release in the Cohabitation Deed was rejected as it was not prudent, fair or reasonable in all the circumstances, and the plaintiff did not give due consideration to independent advice. The plaintiff was found not to have received adequate provision from the estate and was awarded further provision totalling $522,000 in lieu of the provision made for her by will.

Court Disposition

Application for approval of the release rejected. Cross claim dismissed. Order for further provision.

Orders

  • The application for approval of release in the Cohabitation Deed is refused.
  • The cross claim by the defendant is dismissed.