Haertsch v Whiteway [2020] NSWCA 133
Section 24 of the Family Provision Act 1982 (NSW) does not permit property of Stephne Whiteway's estate, held by her executor, to be designated as the notional estate of Donald Whiteway. The power is limited to the direct recipient of the deceased's estate. Additionally, general assurances by Stephne were not sufficient cause to justify Elizabeth Whiteway's delay in applying and there was material prejudice to Stephne and her estate in permitting the late application. Extension of time was wrongly granted.
- Parties
- First Appellant: Adrian Haertsch (as executor of the estate of Stephne Whiteway); Second Appellant: Adrian Haertsch (as executor of the estate of Donald Whiteway); First Respondent: Elizabeth Whiteway; Second Respondent: Jane French
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 July 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed, cross-appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Family Provision, Notional Estate, Extension of Time
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Adrian Haertsch (as executor of the estate of Stephne Whiteway)
First Appellant
Adrian Haertsch (as executor of the estate of Donald Whiteway)
Second Appellant
Elizabeth Whiteway
First Respondent
Jane French
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether property of Stephne Whiteway's estate can be designated notional estate of Donald Whiteway under Family Provision Act 1982 (NSW), s 24
- 2 Whether sufficient cause was shown to extend time for making a family provision application
- 3 Whether the primary judge erred in finding there was no material prejudice to the deceased beneficiary and her estate
Ratio Decidendi
Section 24 of the Family Provision Act 1982 (NSW) does not permit property of Stephne Whiteway's estate, held by her executor, to be designated as the notional estate of Donald Whiteway. The power is limited to the direct recipient of the deceased's estate. Additionally, general assurances by Stephne were not sufficient cause to justify Elizabeth Whiteway's delay in applying and there was material prejudice to Stephne and her estate in permitting the late application. Extension of time was wrongly granted.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed, cross-appeal dismissed
Orders
- Set aside orders 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 made on 11 November 2016
- Dismiss the amended statement of claim
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment