Scott MacRae Investments Pty Limited -v- Baylily Pty Limited [2012] NSWSC 823
All statutory factors under s 95(4) of the Succession Act 2006 (NSW) were satisfied; the terms of release are fair, reasonable, financially and personally advantageous to the second plaintiff, and independent legal advice was taken.
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Scott MacRae Investments Pty Limited ACN 134 101 750; Second Plaintiff: Scott Alexander MacRae; First Defendant: Baylily Pty Limited ACN 003 993 397; Second Defendant: Pacific Lennox Properties Pty Limited; Fourth Defendant: Brooklet Pastoral Co No. 2 Pty Limited; Fifth Defendant: Cuefax Pty Limited; Sixth Defendant: David Robert Alexander MacRae; Seventh Defendant: Susan Beverley MacRae
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 July 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under S 95 Succession Act 2006 (nsw) for Approval of Release of Rights to Apply for Family Provision Orders / Final Decision on Notice of Motion for Approval of Release
- Outcome
- Order made approving the release as sought; further orders disposing of the proceedings by consent.
- Legal Topics
- Family Provision, Release of Rights, Settlement Approval
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Scott MacRae Investments Pty Limited ACN 134 101 750
First Plaintiff
Scott Alexander MacRae
Second Plaintiff
Baylily Pty Limited ACN 003 993 397
First Defendant
Pacific Lennox Properties Pty Limited
Second Defendant
Brooklet Pastoral Co No. 2 Pty Limited
Fourth Defendant
Cuefax Pty Limited
Fifth Defendant
David Robert Alexander MacRae
Sixth Defendant
Susan Beverley MacRae
Seventh Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application Under S 95 Succession Act 2006 (nsw) for Approval of Release of Rights to Apply for Family Provision Orders / Final Decision on Notice of Motion for Approval of Release
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether release of rights to apply for a family provision order should be approved under s 95 of the Succession Act 2006 (NSW)
Ratio Decidendi
All statutory factors under s 95(4) of the Succession Act 2006 (NSW) were satisfied; the terms of release are fair, reasonable, financially and personally advantageous to the second plaintiff, and independent legal advice was taken.
Court Disposition
Order made approving the release as sought; further orders disposing of the proceedings by consent.
Orders
- Order in terms of paragraph 1 of the Notice of Motion dated 9 July 2012 approved under s 95 Succession Act 2006 (NSW)
- Further orders disposing of the proceedings by consent
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment