Treasury Wine Estates Vintners Limited v Pearson [2019] FCAFC 21
The South Australian Employment Court had no jurisdiction to determine the appeal from the Industrial Court because federal jurisdiction, once engaged under the Fair Work Act, could not be transferred by State legislation, and the construction adopted by the Industrial Court as to cl 34.7 of the agreement was correct; penalty rates only applied in the absence of sufficient notice, not in addition to general shift loadings when notice was given.
- Parties
- Appellant (sad 74 of 2018), Respondent (sad 197 of 2018): Treasury Wine Estates Vintners Limited; Respondent (sad 74 of 2018), Appellant (sad 197 of 2018): Barry Pearson
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 February 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment After Hearing of Cross Appeals
- Outcome
- Treasury's appeal dismissed as incompetent; Pearson's appeal dismissed; declaration made that orders of the South Australian Employment Court were made without jurisdiction and are of no force or effect.
- Legal Topics
- Federal Jurisdiction of State Courts, Enterprise Agreement Construction, Appeals Under Fair Work Act, Transfer of Federal Jurisdiction, Interpretation of Industrial Instruments
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Treasury Wine Estates Vintners Limited
Appellant (sad 74 of 2018), Respondent (sad 197 of 2018)
Barry Pearson
Respondent (sad 74 of 2018), Appellant (sad 197 of 2018)
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment After Hearing of Cross Appeals
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an internal appeal lay to the South Australian Employment Court from a decision of an industrial magistrate exercising small claims jurisdiction under s 548 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth)
- 2 Whether the State Act transferring unresolved appeals to the South Australian Employment Tribunal in Court Session validly transferred federal jurisdiction
- 3 Construction of cl 34.7 of the Treasury Wine Estates Central SA Region Vineyards Enterprise Agreement 2014-2017
Ratio Decidendi
The South Australian Employment Court had no jurisdiction to determine the appeal from the Industrial Court because federal jurisdiction, once engaged under the Fair Work Act, could not be transferred by State legislation, and the construction adopted by the Industrial Court as to cl 34.7 of the agreement was correct; penalty rates only applied in the absence of sufficient notice, not in addition to general shift loadings when notice was given.
Court Disposition
Treasury's appeal dismissed as incompetent; Pearson's appeal dismissed; declaration made that orders of the South Australian Employment Court were made without jurisdiction and are of no force or effect.
Orders
- In SAD 74 of 2018: The appeal be dismissed as incompetent for want of jurisdiction.
- In SAD 197 of 2018: Declaration that the purported orders made by the Full Bench of the South Australian Employment Tribunal were made without jurisdiction and are of no force or effect.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment