REGINA v LEW [2003] NSWSC 1073
'With him' in s18(1)(a) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) refers to the accomplice relationship, not the accused's physical presence at the scene; as evidence allowed the jury to conclude the accused foresaw the risk of wounding in the course of the qualifying offence, the felony murder ground remained open and was not withdrawn from the jury.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 November 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Interlocutory Application During Trial
- Outcome
- Application to withdraw felony murder from the jury rejected
- Legal Topics
- ['felony Murder' 'accessory Before the Fact' "interpretation of 'with Him' in S18(1)(a) Crimes Act 1900" 'foreseeability in Felony Murder']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Interlocutory Application During Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether 'with him' in s18(1)(a) of the Crimes Act 1900 requires physical presence of the accused at the time of the offence" 'Whether the evidence permitted the jury to consider felony murder as a ground for conviction against an absent accomplice']
Ratio Decidendi
'With him' in s18(1)(a) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) refers to the accomplice relationship, not the accused's physical presence at the scene; as evidence allowed the jury to conclude the accused foresaw the risk of wounding in the course of the qualifying offence, the felony murder ground remained open and was not withdrawn from the jury.
Court Disposition
Application to withdraw felony murder from the jury rejected
Orders
- []
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment