In the matter of 1derful Pty Limited [2024] NSWSC 1414
Mr Seymour owed and breached fiduciary duties to the Companies by undertaking to act in the Companies' interests, but then advancing his and Fletch's acquisition of the business at undervalue without candid disclosure, and using knowledge and opportunities gained in a fiduciary capacity. Fletch knowingly participated in this breach and is liable in knowing assistance. The process also contravened statutory unconscionability prohibitions under the ASIC Act and corresponding ACL provisions. Fletch, as controller, breached s 420A by failing to take reasonable care to sell the business at market value, and is also liable for conspiracy. The transfer is not voidable under s 37A of the...
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Luke Bunbury; Second Plaintiff: St. Jean CF Pty Ltd; Third Plaintiff: 1derful Pty Ltd (receiver appointed); Fourth Plaintiff: The 1derful Group Pty Ltd (receiver appointed); First Defendant: Fletch Capital Pty Ltd; Second Defendant: Craig Seymour; Third Defendant: Michael Birch; Fourth Defendant: Mitchell Warren Ball
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 November 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Corporations List / Principal Judgment After Final Hearing
- Outcome
- Application substantially allowed as against Mr Seymour, Mr Birch, and Fletch; parties to submit short minutes for appropriate final orders; quantification of loss at $2 million; further orders and costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- Fiduciary Duties, Statutory Unconscionability, Knowing Assistance, Constructive Trust, Conspiracy, Controllers' Duties, Business Valuation, Sale at Undervalue
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Luke Bunbury
First Plaintiff
St. Jean CF Pty Ltd
Second Plaintiff
1derful Pty Ltd (receiver appointed)
Third Plaintiff
The 1derful Group Pty Ltd (receiver appointed)
Fourth Plaintiff
Fletch Capital Pty Ltd
First Defendant
Craig Seymour
Second Defendant
Michael Birch
Third Defendant
Mitchell Warren Ball
Fourth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Equity Corporations List / Principal Judgment After Final Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Did Mr Seymour owe and breach fiduciary duties to the Companies?
- 2 Did Mr Birch owe and breach fiduciary duties to the Companies?
- 3 Did Fletch knowingly assist in a breach of fiduciary duty or knowingly receive property in breach?
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Seymour owed and breached fiduciary duties to the Companies by undertaking to act in the Companies' interests, but then advancing his and Fletch's acquisition of the business at undervalue without candid disclosure, and using knowledge and opportunities gained in a fiduciary capacity. Fletch knowingly participated in this breach and is liable in knowing assistance. The process also contravened statutory unconscionability prohibitions under the ASIC Act and corresponding ACL provisions. Fletch, as controller, breached s 420A by failing to take reasonable care to sell the business at market value, and is also liable for conspiracy. The transfer is not voidable under s 37A of the...
Court Disposition
Application substantially allowed as against Mr Seymour, Mr Birch, and Fletch; parties to submit short minutes for appropriate final orders; quantification of loss at $2 million; further orders and costs reserved.
Orders
- Plaintiffs to elect between remedies (constructive trust, restoration of business and compensation, or account).
- Fletch holds the business acquired on constructive trust for 1derful and 1derful Group (subject to election).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment