R v Rees [2019] NSWDC 681
The offender's offences required a significant custodial sentence because of their objective seriousness, including possession of an imitation firearm, gratuitous property damage, threats and assault against police, escape from custody, hospital damage, and a tomahawk attack causing serious wounds. His extensive violent criminal history, institutionalisation, risk to the community and need for deterrence increased the sentence, but his traumatic and deprived childhood, substance abuse, psychological difficulties, guilty plea discounts, totality, and need for supervised parole mitigated the result. An aggregate sentence of six years and four months with a non-parole period of four years...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 August 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentence / Sentence After Trial, Acquittals on Some Counts, and Guilty Pleas on Other Matters
- Outcome
- The offender was convicted and sentenced to an aggregate sentence of six years and four months with a non-parole period of four years and four months.
- Legal Topics
- ['firearms Offence' 'malicious Damage to Property' 'assault Police' 'intimidate Police' 'escape From Police Custody' 'wound With Intent to Cause Grievous Bodily Harm' 'form 1 Matters' 'totality' 'special Circumstances' 'guilty Plea Discount']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence / Sentence After Trial, Acquittals on Some Counts, and Guilty Pleas on Other Matters
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What sentences should be imposed for the offences arising from three incidents involving an imitation firearm, property damage, offences against police, escape from custody, and wounding with intent to cause grievous bodily harm.' 'How the jury acquittals and rejection of parts of the prosecution and defence versions affected factual findings for sentence.' 'How objective seriousness, including use of a tomahawk, offending while an escapee, and offences against police and hospital property, should be assessed.' "What weight should be given to the offender's deprived and violent childhood, institutionalisation, long custodial history, substance abuse, criminal history, guilty pleas, and prospects of rehabilitation." 'How concurrency, accumulation, totality and special circumstances should affect the aggregate sentence and non-parole period.']
Ratio Decidendi
The offender's offences required a significant custodial sentence because of their objective seriousness, including possession of an imitation firearm, gratuitous property damage, threats and assault against police, escape from custody, hospital damage, and a tomahawk attack causing serious wounds. His extensive violent criminal history, institutionalisation, risk to the community and need for deterrence increased the sentence, but his traumatic and deprived childhood, substance abuse, psychological difficulties, guilty plea discounts, totality, and need for supervised parole mitigated the result. An aggregate sentence of six years and four months with a non-parole period of four years...
Court Disposition
The offender was convicted and sentenced to an aggregate sentence of six years and four months with a non-parole period of four years and four months.
Orders
- ['In respect of each of the counts and in accordance with the pleas and findings of the jury, Jason Lee Rees is convicted.' 'Indicative sentence for enter with firearm s93H(1): one year, nine months.' 'Indicative sentence for damage property: six months.' 'Indicative sentence for assault police: nine months.'...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment