R v Jake Lewis Andrew [No. 2] [2018] NSWDC 382

R v Jake Lewis Andrew [No. 2] [2018] NSWDC 382

Although the firearms offences were serious, especially firing the items on a public bus, this was an exceptional case. The items were air guns capable of firing foam or gel pellets and were understandably regarded by the intellectually disabled offender as toys; his 47 XYY syndrome, intellectual disability, immaturity, ignorance of the seriousness of the offending, guilty pleas, lack of utility in general deterrence, and the distress and custody already experienced meant there was no utility in recording convictions. Community protection could be achieved through supervision under Conditional Release Orders.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
24 September 2018
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence / Sentencing After Guilty Pleas Following Fitness Hearing
Outcome
Findings of guilt without conviction; Conditional Release Orders imposed; firearms and ammunition destruction order made.
Legal Topics
['firing Firearms in a Public Place' 'possession of Prohibited Firearms or Pistols' 'intellectual Disability' '47 XYY Syndrome' 'fitness to Be Tried' 'conditional Release Order' 'finding of Guilt Without Conviction']
['criminal Law' 'sentencing' 'firearms Offences'] ['firing Firearms in a Public Place' 'possession of Prohibited Firearms or Pistols' 'intellectual Disability' '47 XYY Syndrome' 'fitness to Be Tried' 'conditional Release Order' 'finding of Guilt Without Conviction']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Sentence / Sentencing After Guilty Pleas Following Fitness Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['What sentence should be imposed for firing firearms on a public bus and possessing multiple firearms where the offender has an intellectual disability and believed the items were toys.' 'Whether convictions should be recorded or the matter dealt with by findings of guilt without conviction and conditional release orders.' "How the offender's intellectual disability, immaturity, ignorance of the law, guilty pleas and the public safety risks affected sentence."]

Ratio Decidendi

Although the firearms offences were serious, especially firing the items on a public bus, this was an exceptional case. The items were air guns capable of firing foam or gel pellets and were understandably regarded by the intellectually disabled offender as toys; his 47 XYY syndrome, intellectual disability, immaturity, ignorance of the seriousness of the offending, guilty pleas, lack of utility in general deterrence, and the distress and custody already experienced meant there was no utility in recording convictions. Community protection could be achieved through supervision under Conditional Release Orders.

Court Disposition

Findings of guilt without conviction; Conditional Release Orders imposed; firearms and ammunition destruction order made.

Orders

  • ['Counts 1, 2 and 3 on the indictment dealt with pursuant to s 10(1)(b) of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 by findings of guilt without proceeding to conviction.' 'Conditional Release Orders for one year and three months from 24 September 2018 in relation to each count on the indictment.' 'Condition that...