R v Bugmy [2010] NSWSC 1473
On the medical and Tribunal material and the evidence of Ms Robinson that Mr Bugmy understood the trial process, available choices and defences, was attentive, could concentrate, and could give rational and reasonable instructions, the Court was persuaded as a matter of probability that Mr Bugmy was fit for trial.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 December 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Law Fitness to Plead on Charge of Murder / Second Fitness Hearing After the Mental Health Review Tribunal Found the Accused Fit to Be Tried
- Outcome
- Mr Bugmy was found fit for trial.
- Legal Topics
- ['fitness to Plead' 'fitness to Stand Trial' 'murder' 'mental Health Review Tribunal' 'presser Test']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Law Fitness to Plead on Charge of Murder / Second Fitness Hearing After the Mental Health Review Tribunal Found the Accused Fit to Be Tried
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Damien Charles Bugmy was fit to stand trial for murder under section 11 of the Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990.']
Ratio Decidendi
On the medical and Tribunal material and the evidence of Ms Robinson that Mr Bugmy understood the trial process, available choices and defences, was attentive, could concentrate, and could give rational and reasonable instructions, the Court was persuaded as a matter of probability that Mr Bugmy was fit for trial.
Court Disposition
Mr Bugmy was found fit for trial.
Orders
- ['That the matter be listed before the Arraignment Judge on 4 February 2011.' 'That Mr Bugmy be remanded in custody in the meantime.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment