R v Jake Lewis Andrew [No. 1] [2018] NSWDC 381
On balance of probabilities, despite Mr Andrew's intellectual disability and impaired adaptive functioning, he possesses sufficient capacity to enter guilty pleas on the charges by acknowledging the elements through counsel, therefore the proceedings can continue, and referral to the Mental Health Review Tribunal is not required.
- Parties
- Offender: Jake Lewis Andrew; Prosecutor: Director of Public Prosecutions
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 September 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Fitness Hearing
- Outcome
- Jake Lewis Andrew found fit to enter guilty pleas on the charges set out in the proposed indictment.
- Legal Topics
- Fitness to Plead, Firearms Offences, Intellectual Disability, Capacity to Enter Plea
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jake Lewis Andrew
Offender
Director of Public Prosecutions
Prosecutor
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Fitness Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Is Jake Lewis Andrew fit to enter guilty pleas to the charges set out in the proposed indictment despite his intellectual disability and cognitive impairment?
- 2 Does Mr Andrew possess the minimum capacity required for a fair trial in accordance with the Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990 and relevant case law?
Ratio Decidendi
On balance of probabilities, despite Mr Andrew's intellectual disability and impaired adaptive functioning, he possesses sufficient capacity to enter guilty pleas on the charges by acknowledging the elements through counsel, therefore the proceedings can continue, and referral to the Mental Health Review Tribunal is not required.
Court Disposition
Jake Lewis Andrew found fit to enter guilty pleas on the charges set out in the proposed indictment.
Orders
- The proceedings may continue without referral to the Mental Health Review Tribunal.
- The indictment can be presented.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment