R v McKellar [2012] NSWSC 1567

R v McKellar [2012] NSWSC 1567

The accused is fit to stand trial on the balance of probabilities because, despite his chronic psychotic disorder and intellectual impairment, the weight of expert psychiatric evidence (particularly continuous observation by Justice Health staff and the opinions of Dr Brown and Dr Banks) establishes that he meets the Presser criteria. His limitations can be managed with accommodations in trial procedure, and his exaggeration of cognitive deficits as well as selective engagement suggests capacity rather than incapacity.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
14 December 2012
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Fitness to Stand Trial Hearing (interlocutory)
Outcome
Fit to stand trial
Legal Topics
['fitness to Stand Trial' 'criminal Procedure' 'mental Health and Criminal Responsibility']
['criminal Law'] ['fitness to Stand Trial' 'criminal Procedure' 'mental Health and Criminal Responsibility']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Fitness to Stand Trial Hearing (interlocutory)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the accused is fit to stand trial per the Presser criteria, given conflicting psychiatric and psychological evidence regarding his cognitive capacity and mental illness.']

Ratio Decidendi

The accused is fit to stand trial on the balance of probabilities because, despite his chronic psychotic disorder and intellectual impairment, the weight of expert psychiatric evidence (particularly continuous observation by Justice Health staff and the opinions of Dr Brown and Dr Banks) establishes that he meets the Presser criteria. His limitations can be managed with accommodations in trial procedure, and his exaggeration of cognitive deficits as well as selective engagement suggests capacity rather than incapacity.

Court Disposition

Fit to stand trial

Orders

  • ['The accused is found fit to stand trial.' 'The accused is remanded in custody to the arraignments list on 1 February 2013.']