Meissner v Lindsay [2019] NSWSC 82

Meissner v Lindsay [2019] NSWSC 82

The plaintiff, a former spouse of the deceased, failed to establish circumstances showing that he was a natural object of testamentary recognition or that the deceased owed him any moral obligation. The prior divorce and Family Court property settlement, the deceased's expressed wish to sever ties and benefit family and charities, the plaintiff's unreliable evidence, criminal and credibility issues, and the absence of reliable proof of financial need meant that the deceased's testamentary freedom should not be disturbed, notwithstanding the size of the estate.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
12 February 2019
Procedural Posture
Application for a Family Provision Order Pursuant to the Succession Act 2006 (nsw) / Principal Judgment; Final Determination
Outcome
Claim dismissed; plaintiff ordered to pay the defendant's costs.
Legal Topics
['former Spouse' 'prior Property Settlement Orders' 'freedom of Testamentary Disposition' 'criminal History' 'size of Estate' 'adequate Provision']
['succession' 'family Provision'] ['former Spouse' 'prior Property Settlement Orders' 'freedom of Testamentary Disposition' 'criminal History' 'size of Estate' 'adequate Provision']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for a Family Provision Order Pursuant to the Succession Act 2006 (nsw) / Principal Judgment; Final Determination

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the plaintiff, as a former spouse, established circumstances justifying him as a natural object of testamentary recognition by the deceased.' "Whether the deceased had a moral obligation to make provision for the plaintiff in light of their divorce, prior property settlement, relationship history, and the plaintiff's circumstances." "Whether the plaintiff's asserted financial needs justified disturbing the deceased's testamentary dispositions." "What relevance should be given to the plaintiff's credibility, criminal history, and the size of the estate."]

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff, a former spouse of the deceased, failed to establish circumstances showing that he was a natural object of testamentary recognition or that the deceased owed him any moral obligation. The prior divorce and Family Court property settlement, the deceased's expressed wish to sever ties and benefit family and charities, the plaintiff's unreliable evidence, criminal and credibility issues, and the absence of reliable proof of financial need meant that the deceased's testamentary freedom should not be disturbed, notwithstanding the size of the estate.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed; plaintiff ordered to pay the defendant's costs.

Orders

  • ['I dismiss the claim.' "I order the plaintiff to pay the defendant's costs."]