Benjamin Victor Francis Robinson and Aballa Pty Limited v Genevieve Nancy Gollan and Malcolm John Gollan (No 2) [2012] NSWSC 132

Benjamin Victor Francis Robinson and Aballa Pty Limited v Genevieve Nancy Gollan and Malcolm John Gollan (No 2) [2012] NSWSC 132

Because the Plaintiffs pressed for possession and the Defendants' established estoppel entitled them to compensation for expenditure rather than a continued right to occupy, the Plaintiffs were entitled to possession, stayed until 31 May 2012, while the Cross-Claimants were entitled to equitable compensation of $194,118 secured by an equitable lien. For costs, the Cross-Claim was the primary matter in dispute; the Cross-Claimants' unsuccessful issues were not severable or predominant, so the Cross-Defendants were ordered to pay the Cross-Claimants' costs of the Cross-Claim, with no order for costs attributable to the Statement of Claim.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
23 February 2012
Procedural Posture
Equity Division Proceedings Concerning Possession of Land, Equitable Compensation and Costs / Form of Final Orders After Judgment Delivered on 9 February 2012
Outcome
Order for possession in favour of the Plaintiffs; equitable compensation in favour of the Defendants; Cross-Defendants to pay the Cross-Claimants' costs of the Cross-Claim.
Legal Topics
['form of Final Orders' 'order for Possession' 'equitable Compensation' 'equitable Lien' 'estoppel' 'costs Follow the Event' 'failed Gift of Residue Under Will']
['practice and Procedure' 'equity' 'costs' 'property'] ['form of Final Orders' 'order for Possession' 'equitable Compensation' 'equitable Lien' 'estoppel' 'costs Follow the Event' 'failed Gift of Residue Under Will']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Equity Division Proceedings Concerning Possession of Land, Equitable Compensation and Costs / Form of Final Orders After Judgment Delivered on 9 February 2012

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Plaintiffs should receive an order for possession of the Old Homestead now that they pressed for that relief.' "Whether the Defendants' reliance on cl 6.1 of the Will or estoppel principles required dismissal of the Statement of Claim." 'Whether equitable compensation of $194,118 and an equitable lien should be ordered in favour of the Cross-Claimants.' 'What costs order should be made where the Plaintiffs obtained possession but the Cross-Claimants substantially succeeded on the Cross-Claim.']

Ratio Decidendi

Because the Plaintiffs pressed for possession and the Defendants' established estoppel entitled them to compensation for expenditure rather than a continued right to occupy, the Plaintiffs were entitled to possession, stayed until 31 May 2012, while the Cross-Claimants were entitled to equitable compensation of $194,118 secured by an equitable lien. For costs, the Cross-Claim was the primary matter in dispute; the Cross-Claimants' unsuccessful issues were not severable or predominant, so the Cross-Defendants were ordered to pay the Cross-Claimants' costs of the Cross-Claim, with no order for costs attributable to the Statement of Claim.

Court Disposition

Order for possession in favour of the Plaintiffs; equitable compensation in favour of the Defendants; Cross-Defendants to pay the Cross-Claimants' costs of the Cross-Claim.

Orders

  • ['Order for possession in favour of the Plaintiffs of all that piece or parcel of land in the Shire of Moree Plains, County of Staplyton and Parish of Boggabilla situate on the southern side of and having a frontage of 1,000 (incorrectly shown on the title deeds as 100) links to the Newell Highway by depths on the...