Edward Ted Lakis and Anor v Michael Victor Lardis and Anor [2017] NSWSC 321
The transfer of 49% of Mr Lardis's interest in the Dolls Point Property to Mrs Lardis on 29 January 2013 was made with intent to defraud, hinder or delay creditors within the meaning of s 37A. The transfer was voluntary, not for valuable consideration, and designed to put the property beyond the reach of potential creditor claims, namely Amazon and Mr Lakis. Mrs Lardis was not a purchaser in good faith without notice. Therefore, the transfer is voidable at the Plaintiffs' instance.
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Edward Ted Lakis; Second Plaintiff: Amazon Pest Control Pty Ltd (In Liq) ACN 092 833 531; First Defendant: Michael Victor Lardis; Second Defendant: Athena Lardis
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 March 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Plaintiffs succeed—transfer voidable under s 37A; orders to be heard further.
- Legal Topics
- Fraudulent Conveyance, Alienation of Property, Voidable Transactions, Intention to Defraud Creditors, Purchaser in Good Faith, Creditors’ Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Edward Ted Lakis
First Plaintiff
Amazon Pest Control Pty Ltd (In Liq) ACN 092 833 531
Second Plaintiff
Michael Victor Lardis
First Defendant
Athena Lardis
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the transfer of 49% interest in property by Mr Lardis to Mrs Lardis was with intent to defraud creditors and voidable under s 37A of the Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW)
- 2 Whether Mrs Lardis was a purchaser in good faith without notice of intent to defraud creditors within s 37A(3) of the Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW)
- 3 Determination of the relevant date of alienation for voidability under s 37A
Ratio Decidendi
The transfer of 49% of Mr Lardis's interest in the Dolls Point Property to Mrs Lardis on 29 January 2013 was made with intent to defraud, hinder or delay creditors within the meaning of s 37A. The transfer was voluntary, not for valuable consideration, and designed to put the property beyond the reach of potential creditor claims, namely Amazon and Mr Lakis. Mrs Lardis was not a purchaser in good faith without notice. Therefore, the transfer is voidable at the Plaintiffs' instance.
Court Disposition
Plaintiffs succeed—transfer voidable under s 37A; orders to be heard further.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment