Chen v Insight Investment Management Pty Ltd [2024] FCA 719

Chen v Insight Investment Management Pty Ltd [2024] FCA 719

Applicants established a good arguable case and a sufficient danger that judgment may not be satisfied due to asset dissipation; the Court’s discretion warrants a freezing order and ancillary asset disclosure order.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
05 July 2024
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Application for Freezing and Ancillary Orders
Outcome
Application for freezing and ancillary asset disclosure orders granted.
Legal Topics
['freezing Orders' 'ancillary Orders' 'asset Disclosure' 'misleading and Deceptive Conduct' 'repayment of Investment' 'defective Product Disclosure Statements']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Interlocutory Application / Application for Freezing and Ancillary Orders

  1. 1 ['Whether the applicants have a good arguable case' 'Whether there is a risk of dissipation of assets by the respondents' 'Whether an ancillary order is available if no freezing order is made']

Ratio Decidendi

Applicants established a good arguable case and a sufficient danger that judgment may not be satisfied due to asset dissipation; the Court’s discretion warrants a freezing order and ancillary asset disclosure order.

Court Disposition

Application for freezing and ancillary asset disclosure orders granted.

Orders

  • ['Parties must file and serve an agreed minute of orders to give effect to these reasons by 4:00pm on 10 July 2024.' 'Parties must file and serve submissions as to costs of the applicants’ application by 4:00pm on 12 July 2024, limited to five pages.' 'Liberty to apply.' 'Freezing order and ancillary asset...