Chen v Insight Investment Management Pty Ltd [2024] FCA 719
Applicants established a good arguable case and a sufficient danger that judgment may not be satisfied due to asset dissipation; the Court’s discretion warrants a freezing order and ancillary asset disclosure order.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 July 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Application for Freezing and Ancillary Orders
- Outcome
- Application for freezing and ancillary asset disclosure orders granted.
- Legal Topics
- ['freezing Orders' 'ancillary Orders' 'asset Disclosure' 'misleading and Deceptive Conduct' 'repayment of Investment' 'defective Product Disclosure Statements']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Application for Freezing and Ancillary Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicants have a good arguable case' 'Whether there is a risk of dissipation of assets by the respondents' 'Whether an ancillary order is available if no freezing order is made']
Ratio Decidendi
Applicants established a good arguable case and a sufficient danger that judgment may not be satisfied due to asset dissipation; the Court’s discretion warrants a freezing order and ancillary asset disclosure order.
Court Disposition
Application for freezing and ancillary asset disclosure orders granted.
Orders
- ['Parties must file and serve an agreed minute of orders to give effect to these reasons by 4:00pm on 10 July 2024.' 'Parties must file and serve submissions as to costs of the applicants’ application by 4:00pm on 12 July 2024, limited to five pages.' 'Liberty to apply.' 'Freezing order and ancillary asset...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment