Touch for Health Pty Ltd as Trustee for Knight Superannuation Fund v Property Mentors Australia Pty Ltd [2024] FCA 275

Touch for Health Pty Ltd as Trustee for Knight Superannuation Fund v Property Mentors Australia Pty Ltd [2024] FCA 275

Applicants have a good arguable case for relief and there is a danger judgment would be wholly or partly unsatisfied due to potential asset dissipation by second respondent; interests of justice and balance of convenience favour making freezing/ancillary orders to preserve assets pending final determination.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
22 March 2024
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application in Civil Proceeding / Application for Freezing Order Prior to Trial
Outcome
Freezing orders granted against second respondent; applicants to submit proposed orders; second respondent to provide settlement statements and sworn asset/liability statement.
Legal Topics
['freezing Orders' 'asset Preservation' 'misleading and Deceptive Conduct' 'balance of Convenience' 'interlocutory Remedies']
['commercial Law' 'corporations Law'] ['freezing Orders' 'asset Preservation' 'misleading and Deceptive Conduct' 'balance of Convenience' 'interlocutory Remedies']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Interlocutory Application in Civil Proceeding / Application for Freezing Order Prior to Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether applicants have a good arguable case for relief' 'Whether there is a danger that judgment will be wholly or partly unsatisfied due to asset dissipation' 'Balance of convenience/in interests of justice for a freezing order']

Ratio Decidendi

Applicants have a good arguable case for relief and there is a danger judgment would be wholly or partly unsatisfied due to potential asset dissipation by second respondent; interests of justice and balance of convenience favour making freezing/ancillary orders to preserve assets pending final determination.

Court Disposition

Freezing orders granted against second respondent; applicants to submit proposed orders; second respondent to provide settlement statements and sworn asset/liability statement.

Orders

  • ["Applicants' Counsel to submit form of order within two business days to give effect to reasons." 'Half the net proceeds of sale from Golden Avenue Property and net proceeds from sale of Lower Dandenong Road Property to be paid into Court or controlled account.' 'Second respondent to provide applicants notice of...