Zhang v Zhang (No 2) [2025] FCA 98
A material change of circumstances was found since the original freezing orders were made, including uncertainty in asset values and significant asset transactions. This justified the variation of the freezing orders to require payment into court of a sum up to $7,334,167.33, to the extent the first applicant is able, to protect the court's process. The order is limited so as not to place the applicant in contempt if compliance is impossible. Additional document disclosure was refused as outside the purpose of ancillary disclosure orders.
- Parties
- First Applicant / First Cross Respondent: James Tenghui Zhang; Second Applicant: Yong Heng Australia Pty Ltd; Third Applicant / Fifth Cross Respondent: AUSEA Capital Investments Pty Ltd (ACN 169 944 950); Fourth Applicant / Third Cross Respondent: Australia Bai Fu Xin (International) Investment Pty Ltd (ACN 125 275 854); First Respondent / First Cross Claimant: Yihao (Eric) Zhang; Second Respondent / Second Cross Claimant: Tasman Development Holdings Pty Ltd (ACN 168 751 077); Third Respondent: Xinran (Yvonne) Liu; Fourth Respondent: Northwalker Realty Pty Ltd (ACN 607 370 721); Second Cross Respondent: 10 London Street Pty Ltd (ACN 607 189 739); Fourth Cross Respondent: Yong Heng Australia Ltd (ACN 605 345 239)
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 February 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application in Ongoing Proceedings / Application to Vary Freezing Orders Post Initial Orders, Before Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application for variation of freezing orders granted in part - payment into court ordered to the extent practicable; broader document disclosure refused; costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- Freezing Orders, Interlocutory Relief, Security for Payment Into Court, Disclosure Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James Tenghui Zhang
First Applicant / First Cross Respondent
Yong Heng Australia Pty Ltd
Second Applicant
AUSEA Capital Investments Pty Ltd (ACN 169 944 950)
Third Applicant / Fifth Cross Respondent
Australia Bai Fu Xin (International) Investment Pty Ltd (ACN 125 275 854)
Fourth Applicant / Third Cross Respondent
Yihao (Eric) Zhang
First Respondent / First Cross Claimant
Tasman Development Holdings Pty Ltd (ACN 168 751 077)
Second Respondent / Second Cross Claimant
Xinran (Yvonne) Liu
Third Respondent
Northwalker Realty Pty Ltd (ACN 607 370 721)
Fourth Respondent
10 London Street Pty Ltd (ACN 607 189 739)
Second Cross Respondent
Yong Heng Australia Ltd (ACN 605 345 239)
Fourth Cross Respondent
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application in Ongoing Proceedings / Application to Vary Freezing Orders Post Initial Orders, Before Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether circumstances justify variation of freezing orders to require payment into court
- 2 Whether additional disclosure should be ordered
- 3 Whether current asset position supports maintenance or variation of freezing orders
Ratio Decidendi
A material change of circumstances was found since the original freezing orders were made, including uncertainty in asset values and significant asset transactions. This justified the variation of the freezing orders to require payment into court of a sum up to $7,334,167.33, to the extent the first applicant is able, to protect the court's process. The order is limited so as not to place the applicant in contempt if compliance is impossible. Additional document disclosure was refused as outside the purpose of ancillary disclosure orders.
Court Disposition
Application for variation of freezing orders granted in part - payment into court ordered to the extent practicable; broader document disclosure refused; costs reserved.
Orders
- First Applicant to disclose by affidavit his assets in Australia by 4.00pm on 6 March 2025, with full particulars.
- Freezing Orders varied to require, by 4.00pm on 20 March 2025, payment into Court of up to $7,334,167.33, to the extent the First Applicant is able, pending determination of the proceeding.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment