Wollongong Coal Limited v PCL (Shipping) Pte Ltd [2020] NSWSC 184
The August Bills were surrendered, marked "NULL & VOID" with the Owner's authority, and replaced by Switch Bills identifying New Alloys as shipper. WCL consented to that course, as evidenced by its seal and signature on the August Bills. The parties intended the Switch Bills to be substituted for the August Bills, with New Alloys assuming identical obligations, and the necessary consideration was New Alloys' promise to pay freight. Any liability WCL otherwise had under the August Bills was therefore extinguished, so PCL as assignee could not recover from WCL.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 March 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Supreme Court of New South Wales Equity Commercial Arbitration List Proceeding Concerning a Shipping Claim Under Bills of Lading / Principal Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- PCL's claim against WCL under the August Bills is to be dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['freight Payable as Per Charter Party' "owner's Bills of Lading" 'switch Bills of Lading' 'novation' 'cancellation of Bills of Lading' "shipper's Liability for Freight" 'demurrage' 'dead Freight' 'bunker Adjustment' 'port Costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Supreme Court of New South Wales Equity Commercial Arbitration List Proceeding Concerning a Shipping Claim Under Bills of Lading / Principal Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether PCL, as assignee of the vessel owner's rights under the August Bills, could recover freight and other shipping costs from WCL as shipper." 'Whether cancellation of the August Bills and issue of the Switch Bills constituted a novation extinguishing any liability WCL had under the August Bills.' 'Whether the words "freight payable as per charter party" imposed liability on WCL to pay freight to the Owner.' 'Whether any recoverable claim under the August Bills included demurrage, dead-freight, bunker adjustment and port costs.']
Ratio Decidendi
The August Bills were surrendered, marked "NULL & VOID" with the Owner's authority, and replaced by Switch Bills identifying New Alloys as shipper. WCL consented to that course, as evidenced by its seal and signature on the August Bills. The parties intended the Switch Bills to be substituted for the August Bills, with New Alloys assuming identical obligations, and the necessary consideration was New Alloys' promise to pay freight. Any liability WCL otherwise had under the August Bills was therefore extinguished, so PCL as assignee could not recover from WCL.
Court Disposition
PCL's claim against WCL under the August Bills is to be dismissed.
Orders
- ["Claim of vessel owner's assignee against shipper under bills of lading to be dismissed." 'The parties should bring in short minutes to give effect to the reasons.' 'The Court will hear the parties as to costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment