Saga Holidays Limited v Commissioner of Taxation [2006] FCAFC 191
The packaged tour contract between Saga and the tourist created a contractual right for the tourist to receive accommodation in Australia, which is a 'contractual right exercisable over or in relation to land' under s 195-1(c) of the GST Act. This constitutes a supply of real property for GST purposes. As the land is in Australia, the supply is connected with Australia under s 9-25(4). The accommodation component is not merely incidental to the tour and must be treated as a separate supply connected with Australia and subject to GST. The appeal and cross-appeal were both dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 December 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Full Court on Appeal From a Single Judge of the Federal Court
- Outcome
- Appeal and cross-appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['goods and Services Tax (gst)' 'taxable Supply' 'statutory Construction' 'cross Border Transactions' 'real Property Definition Under Gst' 'incidental Supply Under S 96 5' 'executory Contracts and GST Liability']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Full Court on Appeal From a Single Judge of the Federal Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the supply by Saga Holidays Limited to non-resident tourists of the accommodation component of a packaged Australian tour is a supply of 'real property' within s 195-1 of the GST Act" "Whether the supply is 'connected with Australia' within s 9-5 of the Act" 'Whether the accommodation component is incidental to other components of the tour for the purposes of s 96-5(4)' 'Whether services and facilities associated with accommodation are part of the supply of real property']
Ratio Decidendi
The packaged tour contract between Saga and the tourist created a contractual right for the tourist to receive accommodation in Australia, which is a 'contractual right exercisable over or in relation to land' under s 195-1(c) of the GST Act. This constitutes a supply of real property for GST purposes. As the land is in Australia, the supply is connected with Australia under s 9-25(4). The accommodation component is not merely incidental to the tour and must be treated as a separate supply connected with Australia and subject to GST. The appeal and cross-appeal were both dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal and cross-appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed.' "The appellant pay the respondent's costs of the appeal." 'The cross-appeal be dismissed.' "The cross-appellant pay the cross-respondent's costs of the cross-appeal."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment