Filmlock Pty Limited v Nissi Investments Pty Limited (No 3) [2013] NSWSC 1594
Given the defendants’ conduct, the adequacy of the plaintiffs’ evidence and the absence of any response from the defendants, it is appropriate to order payment of costs by the defendants to the first and third plaintiffs in the gross fixed sum of $242,996.06.
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Filmlock Pty Limited; Third Plaintiff: Pearse Property Group Pty Limited; First Defendant: Nissi Investments Pty Limited; Second Defendant: Samuel Ng; Third Defendant: Soni Tanuwidjaja
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 November 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Determination / Application for Gross Fixed Sum Costs Order
- Outcome
- Defendants ordered to pay first and third plaintiffs' costs in the gross fixed sum of $242,996.06.
- Legal Topics
- Gross Fixed Sum Costs Order, Assessment of Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Filmlock Pty Limited
First Plaintiff
Pearse Property Group Pty Limited
Third Plaintiff
Nissi Investments Pty Limited
First Defendant
Samuel Ng
Second Defendant
Soni Tanuwidjaja
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Costs Determination / Application for Gross Fixed Sum Costs Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should make an order for costs in a specified gross fixed sum under s 98(4)(c) Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW)
- 2 Whether the sum claimed is logical, fair, and reasonable given the conduct of the parties
Ratio Decidendi
Given the defendants’ conduct, the adequacy of the plaintiffs’ evidence and the absence of any response from the defendants, it is appropriate to order payment of costs by the defendants to the first and third plaintiffs in the gross fixed sum of $242,996.06.
Court Disposition
Defendants ordered to pay first and third plaintiffs' costs in the gross fixed sum of $242,996.06.
Orders
- The defendants are to pay the first and third plaintiffs’ costs of the proceedings in the gross fixed sum of $242,996.06.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment