The Owners-Strata Plan 47027 v McGinn (No 2) [2019] NSWSC 219
Given Ms McGinn’s conduct, which caused unnecessary costs and would likely disrupt any assessment process, and having uncontested, expert evidence on quantum, it is appropriate and fair to order a gross sum for costs rather than engage in a delayed and expensive assessment process.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 March 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Equity / Costs Application After Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Specified gross sum costs order granted to plaintiffs.
- Legal Topics
- ['gross Sum Costs Order' 'party Conduct in Costs Assessment' 'application to Set Aside Subpoena']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Equity / Costs Application After Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether a gross sum costs order should be made instead of a regular costs assessment' "Whether the defendant's conduct increased the costs of the proceedings and would delay costs assessment" 'Appropriateness of quantum for gross sum costs order']
Ratio Decidendi
Given Ms McGinn’s conduct, which caused unnecessary costs and would likely disrupt any assessment process, and having uncontested, expert evidence on quantum, it is appropriate and fair to order a gross sum for costs rather than engage in a delayed and expensive assessment process.
Court Disposition
Specified gross sum costs order granted to plaintiffs.
Orders
- ["The first defendant pay the plaintiffs' costs of the motion to set aside the Westpac subpoena and of the proceedings generally (including the Notice of Motion filed on 24 August 2018), in the specified gross sum of $170,000 (excluding GST), instead of assessed costs."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment