BOCHMAN v STATE BANK OF NEW SOUTH WALES [1995] NSWCA 51

BOCHMAN v STATE BANK OF NEW SOUTH WALES [1995] NSWCA 51

The appellant failed to demonstrate any ground to avoid the mortgage or guarantee; the evidence supported the respondent's case, and there was no misrepresentation, unconscionability, or other relevant misconduct by the bank; appeal dismissed.

Parties
Appellant/defendant: John Bochman; Respondent/plaintiff: State Bank of New South Wales
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
15 March 1995
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Trial Decision, Supreme Court of New South Wales, Court of Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
Guarantee, Mortgage, Contracts Review Act, Misleading and Deceptive Conduct, Undue Influence, Unconscionable Conduct, Breach of Fiduciary Duty

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Bochman

Appellant/defendant

State Bank of New South Wales

Respondent/plaintiff

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Trial Decision, Supreme Court of New South Wales, Court of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the mortgage was executed by Mr Bochman in proper form
  2. 2 Whether Mr Bochman is entitled to relief under the Contracts Review Act or otherwise against liability under the guarantee and mortgage
  3. 3 Whether the guarantee was discharged by acts of Mr Lam and/or the Bank

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant failed to demonstrate any ground to avoid the mortgage or guarantee; the evidence supported the respondent's case, and there was no misrepresentation, unconscionability, or other relevant misconduct by the bank; appeal dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed.
  • Appellant to pay costs.