BOCHMAN v STATE BANK OF NEW SOUTH WALES [1995] NSWCA 51
The appellant failed to demonstrate any ground to avoid the mortgage or guarantee; the evidence supported the respondent's case, and there was no misrepresentation, unconscionability, or other relevant misconduct by the bank; appeal dismissed.
- Parties
- Appellant/defendant: John Bochman; Respondent/plaintiff: State Bank of New South Wales
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 March 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Trial Decision, Supreme Court of New South Wales, Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Guarantee, Mortgage, Contracts Review Act, Misleading and Deceptive Conduct, Undue Influence, Unconscionable Conduct, Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Bochman
Appellant/defendant
State Bank of New South Wales
Respondent/plaintiff
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Trial Decision, Supreme Court of New South Wales, Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the mortgage was executed by Mr Bochman in proper form
- 2 Whether Mr Bochman is entitled to relief under the Contracts Review Act or otherwise against liability under the guarantee and mortgage
- 3 Whether the guarantee was discharged by acts of Mr Lam and/or the Bank
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant failed to demonstrate any ground to avoid the mortgage or guarantee; the evidence supported the respondent's case, and there was no misrepresentation, unconscionability, or other relevant misconduct by the bank; appeal dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed.
- Appellant to pay costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment