In re the Child “AS” [2023] NSWSC 951
There is no detention, let alone an unlawful one, to found a writ of habeas corpus, and the grave allegations of conspiracy and malicious prosecution have not been properly pleaded or supported by any material; thus, the proceedings are an abuse of process and should be dismissed.
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: TS; Second Plaintiff: VS; First Defendant: Secretary, Department of Communities and Justice; Second Defendant: Department of Communities and Justice; Third and Fourth Defendants: Children's Court of New South Wales
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 August 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Claim by Summons for Writ of Habeas Corpus / Dismissal Judgment
- Outcome
- Proceedings dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Habeas Corpus, Vexatious Proceedings, Malicious Prosecution, Abuse of Process
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
TS
First Plaintiff
VS
Second Plaintiff
Secretary, Department of Communities and Justice
First Defendant
Department of Communities and Justice
Second Defendant
Children's Court of New South Wales
Third and Fourth Defendants
Procedural Posture
Claim by Summons for Writ of Habeas Corpus / Dismissal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the writ of habeas corpus is available in relation to the child
- 2 Whether claims of vexatious proceedings and malicious prosecution are justified
- 3 Whether the proceedings constitute an abuse of process
Ratio Decidendi
There is no detention, let alone an unlawful one, to found a writ of habeas corpus, and the grave allegations of conspiracy and malicious prosecution have not been properly pleaded or supported by any material; thus, the proceedings are an abuse of process and should be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Proceedings dismissed
Orders
- The proceedings be dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment