R v Sio [2013] NSWSC 1412
It was ruled that, given Mr Filihia was unavailable, and his ERISP and statements were made in circumstances likely to be reliable and against interest, the evidence met the requirements of s 65(2)(d) Evidence Act and was not outweighed by unfair prejudice or discretionary exclusion; thus, the evidence should be admitted.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Accused: Daniel Jeffrey Sio
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 September 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Interlocutory Application on Voir Dire Regarding Admissibility of Evidence
- Outcome
- Application granted - evidence admitted
- Legal Topics
- Hearsay Exception, Witness Unavailability, Admissibility of Representations, Exclusion of Prejudicial Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Daniel Jeffrey Sio
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Interlocutory Application on Voir Dire Regarding Admissibility of Evidence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether statements and ERISP of Richard Filihia are admissible as evidence under hearsay exceptions when the maker is unavailable
- 2 Whether the representations are made in circumstances that make them reliable or unlikely to be fabricated
- 3 Whether discretion under s 135 or mandatory exclusion under s 137 Evidence Act should be exercised against admission
Ratio Decidendi
It was ruled that, given Mr Filihia was unavailable, and his ERISP and statements were made in circumstances likely to be reliable and against interest, the evidence met the requirements of s 65(2)(d) Evidence Act and was not outweighed by unfair prejudice or discretionary exclusion; thus, the evidence should be admitted.
Court Disposition
Application granted - evidence admitted
Orders
- ERISP of Richard Filihia on 24 October 2012 admitted, subject to further objections
- ERISP of Mr Filihia on 25 October 2012 admitted, subject to further objections
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment